The bill has two parts now and both are published: a base fee from $99 and a resolution rate from $2 (pay as you go) down to $1 with volume packages.
Visit Typewise → Affiliate link — the rest of this page is the honest version, including who should skip it.
⚡ Short on time? Watch the 30-second verdict Short.
✓ Pricing re-verified 5 Sep 2026
A base plan plus a per-resolution rate. Starter is $99 a month or $999 a year with 1 user, email and chat, a $20 monthly AI Operator budget and pay-as-you-go resolutions at $2 each. Growth is $599 a month or $5,999 a year with 5 users, all digital channels, a $100 AI Operator budget and volume packages that bring resolutions down to $1.
Business is $2,000 a month billed annually with unlimited workspaces, a $1,500 AI Operator budget, a custom DPA and a success consultant. Additional users are $89 a month. Every plan starts with a 14-day trial of 100 resolution credits and $10 of AI Operator credit, no card. The page defines the meter: a full resolution counts once, and unresolved tickets are free.
Prices are in USD and shown in EUR, GBP or CHF at parity depending on your location. History: in August 2026 the only published number was 'starting from $1 per resolution' on the home page and /pricing returned a 404. Plans change — always verify the live price on their site.
What the page defines is that a full resolution counts once and an unresolved ticket is free; what it still leaves to you is where the line falls in practice — whether a conversation handed to a human counts as resolved, and whether a reopened ticket counts again. Get those two answers in writing before the trial, because they decide whether the tool bills you most on the tickets it handles worst.
The ROI calculator on their site is the vendor's own arithmetic; the pilot is where you replace it with yours.
AI agents for customer service that resolve requests end to end and take action in the systems you already run — CRM, ERP, billing, commerce — configured in plain language instead of flowcharts. Pricing starts at $1 per resolution on their own site (read 2026-08-17) and there is no published plan table, so what counts as a resolution is the number to pin down before a pilot.

Recurring themes from the buyer-review sites listed at the foot of this page, read in August 2026. We have not run Typewise ourselves, so this is other buyers' experience rather than ours. We summarise it here because the complaints are usually the part a vendor page leaves out.
The published ladder (read 5 September 2026) is Starter $99 a month with $2 a resolution, Growth $599 with volume packages down to $1, and Business $2,000 a month billed annually; every plan includes an AI Operator budget ($20, $100 and $1,500) and extra users are $89 a month. That replaces the August picture, when 'starting from $1 per resolution' on the home page was the only number and /pricing returned a 404.
Because the bill still scales with resolutions rather than seats, the definition of a resolution decides your invoice. The page now states that a full resolution counts once and that unresolved tickets are free. Get two more answers in writing before the trial: does a conversation handed over to a human count as resolved, and does a reopened ticket count again? If a handover bills, every conversation the AI cannot finish costs you twice — once to Typewise and once to the agent who picks it up — and the tool becomes most expensive on the tickets it handles worst.
If a handover does not bill, the pricing is aligned with your interests. Then price it against the right comparison. Per-resolution pricing is priced against labour, not against other software: on Starter, a team handling 2,000 tickets a month is looking at $99 plus up to $4,000 in resolutions if everything resolves through the platform, which is why Growth's volume packages at $1 exist. Work out your own resolved volume before you pick a tier.
Ask what a resolution is, in writing, before you start the trial. The whole bill hangs on that one word and it is published nowhere. Three specific questions: does a reopened ticket bill twice, does a handover to a human still count as a resolution, and what is the rate at your monthly volume? '$1' is a floor, not a rate card, and there is no pricing page to check it against.
Work out your own cost per ticket before the demo. Take your support team's fully-loaded cost and divide by tickets closed; that figure, not a software comparison, is what per-resolution pricing has to beat. It also gives you something concrete to negotiate with. Then run the pilot on your real mix rather than your simple tickets. Measure two things: what share of conversations the AI closed without a human, and what each handover did to the invoice.
The vendor's ROI calculator is their arithmetic on their assumptions — the pilot exists to replace it with yours.
The natural comparison is Intercom Fin or your helpdesk's native AI — the honest comparison is where the work happens: Fin lives inside Intercom's own desk, while Typewise sells itself as a layer above the stack you already run, reading and writing in CRM, ERP and commerce systems. Already on Intercom? The native option starts ahead. Support work spread across several systems? That layer is the argument — ask both what counts as a resolution before you compare the price.
Everything we publish about Typewise links back here — the review stays the honest hub:
The ex-banker filter — the same yardstick on every review (how we review): My ex-banker filter is simple: does Typewise remove a real cost — time, errors, missed revenue — bigger than what it charges? If the job above is genuinely yours, it's worth a look. We never publish fake or “exclusive” prices, so always confirm the current plan on their site.
Usually it sits on top rather than replacing everything. Tools in this class tend to become the layer where work is tracked and handed off, while your existing systems stay the source of truth for their own data. Before you buy, map which tools it would replace outright and which it would merely sync with. If the answer is that it syncs with all of them, you are adding a layer rather than removing one.
This is a researched assessment, not a hands-on test — where we've used a tool ourselves, we say so explicitly. We name what each tool is genuinely good and bad at, and we earn a commission only if you sign up, at no cost to you.
We list our sources because most review sites do not. How we review →
The operations & workflow tools closest to Typewise that we have also reviewed. They overlap rather than match:
New dossiers, cost-traps we found, and tools that earned a keep — no hype, no sponsored-disguised-as-advice. Unsubscribe anytime.
This is our researched assessment — not a paid placement. The “Visit” links on this page are affiliate links: we may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you, and it never changes our take. How we review →
Spotted an error? Tell us — we verify and fix fast, whether or not it flatters the product.